↓ Skip to main content

Japanese Vowel Devoicing: Cases of Consecutive Devoicing Environments

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of East Asian Linguistics, July 2001
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#9 of 119)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
37 Mendeley
Title
Japanese Vowel Devoicing: Cases of Consecutive Devoicing Environments
Published in
Journal of East Asian Linguistics, July 2001
DOI 10.1023/a:1011221225072
Authors

Ayako Tsuchida

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 3%
Uganda 1 3%
Canada 1 3%
Unknown 34 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 22%
Professor 5 14%
Student > Bachelor 4 11%
Researcher 4 11%
Student > Master 4 11%
Other 5 14%
Unknown 7 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Linguistics 29 78%
Physics and Astronomy 1 3%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 3%
Unknown 6 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 September 2023.
All research outputs
#8,534,976
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Journal of East Asian Linguistics
#9
of 119 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,991
of 40,893 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of East Asian Linguistics
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 119 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 40,893 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them