↓ Skip to main content

“Looking Up” and “Looking Down”: On the Dual Character of Mechanistic Explanations

Overview of attention for article published in Journal for General Philosophy of Science, February 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
8 Mendeley
Title
“Looking Up” and “Looking Down”: On the Dual Character of Mechanistic Explanations
Published in
Journal for General Philosophy of Science, February 2018
DOI 10.1007/s10838-018-9402-7
Authors

Kari L. Theurer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 8 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor > Associate Professor 2 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 13%
Researcher 1 13%
Student > Master 1 13%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 2 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Philosophy 5 63%
Materials Science 1 13%
Unknown 2 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 February 2018.
All research outputs
#16,086,610
of 23,864,146 outputs
Outputs from Journal for General Philosophy of Science
#120
of 188 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#277,220
of 446,735 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal for General Philosophy of Science
#6
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,864,146 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 188 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 446,735 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.