| Title |
Palytoxins: A still haunting Hawaiian curse
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Phytochemistry Reviews, June 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11101-010-9185-x |
| Authors |
Patrizia Ciminiello, Carmela Dell’Aversano, Ernesto Fattorusso, Martino Forino |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 4% |
| Russia | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 21 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 22% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 13% |
| Researcher | 2 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 9% |
| Other | 4 | 17% |
| Unknown | 5 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 30% |
| Chemistry | 5 | 22% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 13% |
| Environmental Science | 2 | 9% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 4 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 April 2018.
All research outputs
#2,936,982
of 22,785,242 outputs
Outputs from Phytochemistry Reviews
#36
of 330 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,434
of 96,068 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Phytochemistry Reviews
#2
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,785,242 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 330 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 96,068 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.