↓ Skip to main content

Diffusion tensor imaging changes following mild, moderate and severe adult traumatic brain injury: a meta-analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Brain Imaging and Behavior, January 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
109 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
101 Mendeley
Title
Diffusion tensor imaging changes following mild, moderate and severe adult traumatic brain injury: a meta-analysis
Published in
Brain Imaging and Behavior, January 2018
DOI 10.1007/s11682-018-9823-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Erica J. Wallace, Jane L. Mathias, Lynn Ward

Abstract

Diffusion tensor imaging quantifies the asymmetry (fractional anisotropy; FA) and amount of water diffusion (mean diffusivity/apparent diffusion coefficient; MD/ADC) and has been used to assess white matter damage following traumatic brain injury (TBI). In healthy brains, diffusion is constrained by the organization of axons, resulting in high FA and low MD/ADC. Following a TBI, diffusion may be altered; however the exact nature of these changes has yet to be determined. A meta-analysis was therefore conducted to determine the location and extent of changes in DTI following adult TBI. The data from 44 studies that compared the FA and/or MD/ADC data from TBI and Control participants in different regions of interest (ROIs) were analyzed. The impact of injury severity, post-injury interval (acute: ≤ 1 week, subacute: 1 week-3 months, chronic: > 3 months), scanner details and acquisition parameters were investigated in subgroup analyses, with the findings indicating that mild TBI should be examined separately to that of moderate to severe injuries. Lower FA values were found in 88% of brain regions following mild TBI and 92% following moderate-severe TBI, compared to Controls. MD/ADC was higher in 95% and 100% of brain regions following mild and moderate-severe TBI, respectively. Moderate to severe TBI resulted in larger changes in FA and MD/ADC than mild TBI. Overall, changes to FA and MD/ADC were widespread, reflecting more symmetric and a higher amount of diffusion, indicative of white matter damage.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 101 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 101 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 18%
Researcher 15 15%
Student > Master 10 10%
Student > Bachelor 8 8%
Other 8 8%
Other 13 13%
Unknown 29 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 19 19%
Neuroscience 19 19%
Engineering 7 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 4%
Psychology 4 4%
Other 8 8%
Unknown 40 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 February 2018.
All research outputs
#20,465,050
of 23,023,224 outputs
Outputs from Brain Imaging and Behavior
#1,010
of 1,156 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#377,828
of 440,331 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Brain Imaging and Behavior
#28
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,023,224 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,156 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 440,331 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.