↓ Skip to main content

Experiment double beta decay: Historical review of 75 years of research

Overview of attention for article published in Physics of Atomic Nuclei, May 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#17 of 177)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
7 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
54 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
39 Mendeley
Title
Experiment double beta decay: Historical review of 75 years of research
Published in
Physics of Atomic Nuclei, May 2011
DOI 10.1134/s1063778811030070
Authors

A. S. Barabash

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 5%
China 1 3%
Belgium 1 3%
Unknown 35 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 21%
Student > Master 6 15%
Student > Postgraduate 4 10%
Student > Bachelor 2 5%
Other 5 13%
Unknown 5 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 29 74%
Chemical Engineering 1 3%
Psychology 1 3%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 3%
Neuroscience 1 3%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 4 10%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 April 2024.
All research outputs
#7,453,126
of 22,785,242 outputs
Outputs from Physics of Atomic Nuclei
#17
of 177 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,443
of 110,042 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Physics of Atomic Nuclei
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,785,242 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 177 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 110,042 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them