You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Ecology and genomics of an important crop wild relative as a prelude to agricultural innovation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Communications, February 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41467-018-02867-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Eric J.B. von Wettberg, Peter L. Chang, Fatma Başdemir, Noelia Carrasquila-Garcia, Lijalem Balcha Korbu, Susan M. Moenga, Gashaw Bedada, Alex Greenlon, Ken S. Moriuchi, Vasantika Singh, Matilde A. Cordeiro, Nina V. Noujdina, Kassaye Negash Dinegde, Syed Gul Abbas Shah Sani, Tsegaye Getahun, Lisa Vance, Emily Bergmann, Donna Lindsay, Bullo Erena Mamo, Emily J. Warschefsky, Emmanuel Dacosta-Calheiros, Edward Marques, Mustafa Abdullah Yilmaz, Ahmet Cakmak, Janna Rose, Andrew Migneault, Christopher P. Krieg, Sevgi Saylak, Hamdi Temel, Maren L. Friesen, Eleanor Siler, Zhaslan Akhmetov, Huseyin Ozcelik, Jana Kholova, Canan Can, Pooran Gaur, Mehmet Yildirim, Hari Sharma, Vincent Vadez, Kassahun Tesfaye, Asnake Fikre Woldemedhin, Bunyamin Tar’an, Abdulkadir Aydogan, Bekir Bukun, R. Varma Penmetsa, Jens Berger, Abdullah Kahraman, Sergey V. Nuzhdin, Douglas R. Cook |
| Abstract |
Domesticated species are impacted in unintended ways during domestication and breeding. Changes in the nature and intensity of selection impart genetic drift, reduce diversity, and increase the frequency of deleterious alleles. Such outcomes constrain our ability to expand the cultivation of crops into environments that differ from those under which domestication occurred. We address this need in chickpea, an important pulse legume, by harnessing the diversity of wild crop relatives. We document an extreme domestication-related genetic bottleneck and decipher the genetic history of wild populations. We provide evidence of ancestral adaptations for seed coat color crypsis, estimate the impact of environment on genetic structure and trait values, and demonstrate variation between wild and cultivated accessions for agronomic properties. A resource of genotyped, association mapping progeny functionally links the wild and cultivated gene pools and is an essential resource chickpea for improvement, while our methods inform collection of other wild crop progenitor species. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 52 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 10 | 19% |
| Australia | 3 | 6% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 6% |
| Canada | 2 | 4% |
| Germany | 2 | 4% |
| Panama | 1 | 2% |
| Dominican Republic | 1 | 2% |
| South Africa | 1 | 2% |
| Spain | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 6% |
| Unknown | 25 | 48% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 37 | 71% |
| Scientists | 14 | 27% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 190 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 190 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 34 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 33 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 22 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 6% |
| Other | 10 | 5% |
| Other | 32 | 17% |
| Unknown | 47 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 100 | 53% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 14 | 7% |
| Environmental Science | 8 | 4% |
| Engineering | 3 | 2% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 10 | 5% |
| Unknown | 52 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 205. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 April 2022.
All research outputs
#195,224
of 25,806,763 outputs
Outputs from Nature Communications
#2,771
of 58,540 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,715
of 458,131 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Communications
#70
of 1,216 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,806,763 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 58,540 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 55.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 458,131 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,216 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.