↓ Skip to main content

Carvedilol protection against endogenous Aβ-induced neurotoxicity in N2a cells

Overview of attention for article published in Cell Stress and Chaperones, February 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
26 Mendeley
Title
Carvedilol protection against endogenous Aβ-induced neurotoxicity in N2a cells
Published in
Cell Stress and Chaperones, February 2018
DOI 10.1007/s12192-018-0881-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jia Liu, Min Wang

Abstract

Mutations in amyloid precursor protein (APP) and presenilin1 result in overproduction and accumulation of β-amyloid (Aβ) peptide, which has been shown to play an important role in Alzheimer's disease (AD) pathogenesis. Carvedilol, a nonselective β-adrenergic receptor blocker used for treatment for heart failure and hypertension, has displayed its neuroprotective capacity due to its antioxidant property. In this study, we investigated whether Carvedilol has a neuronal protective effect against endogenous Aβ neurotoxicity in mouse Neuro2a (N2a) cells transfected with Swedish amyloid precursor protein (Swe-APP) mutant and Presenilin exon9 deletion mutant (N2a/Swe.D9). Elevated levels of reactive oxygen species (ROS), protein carbonyls, and 4-HNE were found in N2a/Swe.D9 cells, which were ameliorated by administration of Carvedilol in a dose-dependent manner. In addition, the levels of ATP and mitochondrial membrane potential were reduced in N2a/Swe.D9 cells, which were restored by treatment with Carvedilol. N2a/Swe.D9 cells displayed increased vulnerability to H2O2-induced cell death and apoptosis, which could be attenuated by Carvedilol. Mechanistically, we found that Carvedilol prevented apoptosis signals through reducing cytochrome C release and the level of cleaved caspase-3. Taken together, our findings suggest a possible use of Carvedilol in AD treatment.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 26 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 12%
Student > Master 3 12%
Other 2 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 8%
Student > Bachelor 2 8%
Other 4 15%
Unknown 10 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 3 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 12%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 8%
Neuroscience 2 8%
Other 4 15%
Unknown 9 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 January 2019.
All research outputs
#20,674,485
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from Cell Stress and Chaperones
#495
of 699 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#347,920
of 454,542 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cell Stress and Chaperones
#9
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 699 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 454,542 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.