| Title |
The real type and ideal type of transdisciplinary processes: part I—theoretical foundations
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Sustainability Science, August 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11625-015-0326-4 |
| Authors |
Roland W. Scholz, Gerald Steiner |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 429 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 3 | <1% |
| Sweden | 3 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Burundi | 1 | <1% |
| Austria | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 415 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 88 | 21% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 72 | 17% |
| Researcher | 67 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 37 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 24 | 6% |
| Other | 61 | 14% |
| Unknown | 80 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 118 | 28% |
| Social Sciences | 86 | 20% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 23 | 5% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 14 | 3% |
| Arts and Humanities | 13 | 3% |
| Other | 79 | 18% |
| Unknown | 96 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 March 2018.
All research outputs
#8,882,501
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Sustainability Science
#683
of 972 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#99,103
of 279,795 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Sustainability Science
#8
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 972 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.9. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 279,795 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.