↓ Skip to main content

Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Assessment of Pulmonary Hypertension: Initial Experience of a One-Stop Study

Overview of attention for article published in Lung, February 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
32 Mendeley
Title
Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Assessment of Pulmonary Hypertension: Initial Experience of a One-Stop Study
Published in
Lung, February 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00408-018-0097-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gisela M. B. Meyer, Fernanda B. Spilimbergo, Stephan Atmayer, Gabriel S. Pacini, Matheus Zanon, Guilherme Watte, Edson Marchiori, Bruno Hochhegger

Abstract

Our goal was to assess the diagnostic performance of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) as a single method to diagnose pulmonary hypertension (PH) compared to right heart catheterization (RHC), computed tomography (CT), and ventilation/perfusion (V/Q) scintigraphy. We identified 35 patients diagnosed with PH by RHC in our institution who have also undergone a CT, a scintigraphy, and an MRI within a month. All cases were discussed in multidisciplinary meetings. We performed correlations between the MRI-derived hemodynamic parameters and those from RHC. The sensitivity and specificity of MRI were determined to identify its diagnostic performance to identify chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) and interstitial lung disease PH. The gold standard reference for the diagnosis of CTEPH and ILD was based on a review of multimodality imaging (V/Q scintigraphy and CT scan) and clinical findings. Our results showed a good correlation between the hemodynamic parameters of cardiac MRI and RHC. Pulmonary vascular resistance had the best correlation between both methods (r = 0.923). The sensitivity and specificity of MRI to diagnose CTEPH was 100 and 96.8%, respectively. For the ILD-related PH, the MRI yielded a sensitivity of 60.0% and a specificity of 100%. Additionally, cardiac MRI was able to confirm all cases of PAH due to congenital heart disease initially detected by echocardiography. MRI represents a promising imaging modality as an initial, single-shot study, for patients with suspected PH with the advantages of being non-invasive and having no radiation exposure.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 32 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 13%
Student > Bachelor 3 9%
Student > Master 3 9%
Other 3 9%
Other 6 19%
Unknown 8 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 16 50%
Computer Science 1 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 3%
Psychology 1 3%
Engineering 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 12 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 February 2018.
All research outputs
#20,465,050
of 23,023,224 outputs
Outputs from Lung
#743
of 893 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#382,638
of 445,207 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Lung
#16
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,023,224 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 893 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 445,207 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.