↓ Skip to main content

The sperm structure of Embioptera (Insecta) and phylogenetic considerations

Overview of attention for article published in Zoomorphology, March 2007
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
30 Mendeley
Title
The sperm structure of Embioptera (Insecta) and phylogenetic considerations
Published in
Zoomorphology, March 2007
DOI 10.1007/s00435-007-0030-8
Authors

Romano Dallai, Ryuichiro Machida, Yoshie Jintsu, Francesco Frati, Pietro Lupetti

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 4 13%
United Kingdom 1 3%
Russia 1 3%
Japan 1 3%
Unknown 23 77%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 30%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 23%
Other 3 10%
Student > Bachelor 2 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 7%
Other 6 20%
Unknown 1 3%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 23 77%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 2 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 3%
Unknown 4 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 May 2014.
All research outputs
#7,453,350
of 22,786,087 outputs
Outputs from Zoomorphology
#114
of 400 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,124
of 76,830 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Zoomorphology
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,786,087 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 400 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 76,830 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them