↓ Skip to main content

History of blood gas analysis. IV. Leland Clark's oxygen electrode

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Clinical Monitoring, April 1986
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#6 of 131)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
patent
2 patents
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
68 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
100 Mendeley
Title
History of blood gas analysis. IV. Leland Clark's oxygen electrode
Published in
Journal of Clinical Monitoring, April 1986
DOI 10.1007/bf01637680
Pubmed ID
Authors

John W. Severinghaus, Poul B. Astrup

Abstract

The electrochemical reduction of oxygen was discovered by Heinrich Danneel and Walter Nernst in 1897. Polarography using dropping mercury was discovered accidentally by Jaroslav Heyrovsky in Prague in 1922. This method produced the first measured oxygen tension values in plasma and blood in the 1940s. Brink, Davies, and Bronk implanted platinum electrodes in tissue to study oxygen supply, or availability, from about 1940, but these bare electrodes became poisoned when immersed in blood. Leland Clark sealed a platinum cathode in glass and covered it first with cellophane; he then tested silastic and polyethylene membranes. In 1954 Clark conceived and constructed the first membrane-covered oxygen electrode having both the anode and cathode behind a nonconductive polyethylene membrane. The limited permeability of polyethylene to oxygen reduced depletion of oxygen from the sample, making possible quantitative measurements of oxygen tension in blood, solutions, or gases. This invention led to the introduction of modern blood gas apparatus.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 100 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Unknown 99 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 22%
Student > Master 15 15%
Researcher 13 13%
Student > Bachelor 11 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 5%
Other 16 16%
Unknown 18 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 18 18%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 13%
Engineering 11 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 7%
Other 11 11%
Unknown 29 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 February 2022.
All research outputs
#3,210,666
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Clinical Monitoring
#6
of 131 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#534
of 10,504 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Clinical Monitoring
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 131 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 10,504 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them