↓ Skip to main content

Effect of Remote Ischemic Preconditioning on Troponin I in CABG

Overview of attention for article published in Anesthesiology And Pain Medicine, August 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
24 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Effect of Remote Ischemic Preconditioning on Troponin I in CABG
Published in
Anesthesiology And Pain Medicine, August 2017
DOI 10.5812/aapm.12549
Pubmed ID
Authors

Fatemeh Javaherforoosh Zadeh, Mohsen Moadeli, Mansoor Soltanzadeh, Farahzad Janatmakan

Abstract

Elective open heart surgery is associated with troponin release in some cases due to myocyte necrosis. The aim of this study was to measure cardiac troponin I (cTnI) preoperatively in elective CABG after remote ischemic preconditioning. Twenty-eight patients were selected for elective CABG. They were randomized to receive remote ischemic preconditioning (induced by three 5-min cycles of inflation with a pneumatic tourniquet and 5-min deflation between inflation episodes as reperfusion). Primary outcomes were cardiac troponin I levels at 6 and 24 hours after the procedure, and the secondary outcomes included creatine phosphokinase, lactate dehydrogenase, and serum creatinine levels. Hemodynamic changes were evaluated between the treatment and control groups. Cardiac troponin I at 6 hours after preconditioning was significantly lower compared to the control group (P = 0.036), and after 24 hours, there was still a significant difference between the two groups (P < 0.05). Remote ischemic preconditioning reduces ischemic biomarkers during coronary artery bypass graft and attenuates procedure-related cardiac troponin I release and eventually reduces cardiovascular events such as myocardial infarction, chest pain, and hemodynamic changes after cardiac surgery.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 24 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 21%
Student > Postgraduate 3 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 8%
Student > Bachelor 2 8%
Other 2 8%
Other 7 29%
Unknown 3 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 15 63%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 4%
Social Sciences 1 4%
Sports and Recreations 1 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 4 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 February 2018.
All research outputs
#20,663,600
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Anesthesiology And Pain Medicine
#203
of 279 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#252,249
of 325,576 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Anesthesiology And Pain Medicine
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 279 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 325,576 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.