↓ Skip to main content

On gravity’s role in the genesis of rest masses of classical fields

Overview of attention for article published in General Relativity and Gravitation, February 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
Title
On gravity’s role in the genesis of rest masses of classical fields
Published in
General Relativity and Gravitation, February 2018
DOI 10.1007/s10714-018-2340-1
Authors

László B. Szabados

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 February 2018.
All research outputs
#19,383,782
of 23,857,313 outputs
Outputs from General Relativity and Gravitation
#999
of 1,448 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#260,915
of 333,005 outputs
Outputs of similar age from General Relativity and Gravitation
#20
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,857,313 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,448 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 333,005 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.