↓ Skip to main content

Planning for Intracavitary Anti-EGFR Radionuclide Therapy of Gliomas. Literature Review and Data on EGFR Expression

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Neuro-Oncology, September 2005
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
24 Mendeley
Title
Planning for Intracavitary Anti-EGFR Radionuclide Therapy of Gliomas. Literature Review and Data on EGFR Expression
Published in
Journal of Neuro-Oncology, September 2005
DOI 10.1007/s11060-005-7410-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Carlsson J, Ren Z.P, Wester K, Sundberg Å.L, Heldin N.E, Hesselager G, Persson M, Gedda L, Tolmachev V, Lundqvist H, Blomquist E, Nistér M

Abstract

Targeting with radionuclide labelled substances that bind specifically to the epidermal growth factor receptor, EGFR, is considered for intracavitary therapy of EGFR-positive glioblastoma multiforme, GBM. Relevant literature is reviewed and examples of EGFR expression in GBM are given. The therapeutical efforts made so far using intracavitary anti-tenascin radionuclide therapy of GBM have given limited effects, probably due to low radiation doses to the migrating glioma cells in the brain. Low radiation doses might be due to limited penetration of the targeting agents or heterogeneity in the expression of the target structure. In this article we focus on the possibilities to target EGFR on the tumour cells instead of an extracellular matrix component. There seems to be a lack of knowledge on the degree of intratumoral variation of EGFR expression in GBM, although the expression seemed rather homogeneous over large areas in most of the examples (n=16) presented from our laboratory. The observed homogeneity was surprising considering the genomic instability and heterogeneity that generally characterises highly malignant tumours. However, overexpression of EGFR is, at least in primary GBMs, one of the steps in the development of malignancy, and tumour cells that lose or downregulate EGFR will probably be outgrown in an expanding tumour cell population. Thus, loss of EGFR expression might not be the critical factor for successful intracavitary radionuclide therapy. Instead, it is likely that the penetration properties of the targeting agents are critical, and detailed studies on this are urgent.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 4%
Unknown 23 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 21%
Researcher 4 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 13%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 13%
Professor 2 8%
Other 5 21%
Unknown 2 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 38%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 13%
Mathematics 2 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 8%
Psychology 2 8%
Other 4 17%
Unknown 2 8%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 October 2016.
All research outputs
#7,453,350
of 22,786,087 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Neuro-Oncology
#1,040
of 2,965 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,425
of 58,711 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Neuro-Oncology
#5
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,786,087 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,965 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 58,711 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.