↓ Skip to main content

Immunohistochemical localization of nerve growth factor and epidermal growth factor in guinea pig prostate gland

Overview of attention for article published in Histochemistry and Cell Biology, July 1984
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
39 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
5 Mendeley
Title
Immunohistochemical localization of nerve growth factor and epidermal growth factor in guinea pig prostate gland
Published in
Histochemistry and Cell Biology, July 1984
DOI 10.1007/bf00495427
Pubmed ID
Authors

H. Shikata, N. Utsumi, M. Hiramatsu, N. Minami, N. Nemoto, T. Shikata

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 20%
Unknown 4 80%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 2 40%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 20%
Professor 1 20%
Unknown 1 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 60%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 20%
Unknown 1 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 November 2010.
All research outputs
#8,534,976
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Histochemistry and Cell Biology
#306
of 1,236 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,502
of 8,592 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Histochemistry and Cell Biology
#3
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,236 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 8,592 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.