↓ Skip to main content

Corneal replacement using a synthetic hydrogel cornea, AlphaCor™: device, preliminary outcomes and complications

Overview of attention for article published in Eye, April 2003
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
3 patents
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
130 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
88 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Corneal replacement using a synthetic hydrogel cornea, AlphaCor™: device, preliminary outcomes and complications
Published in
Eye, April 2003
DOI 10.1038/sj.eye.6700333
Pubmed ID
Authors

C R Hicks, G J Crawford, X Lou, D T Tan, G R Snibson, G Sutton, N Downie, L Werner, T V Chirila, I J Constable

Abstract

Clinical assessment of outcome of corneal replacement with a synthetic cornea, AlphaCor, in patients considered at too high risk for conventional penetrating keratoplasty with donor tissue to be successful, but excluding indications such as end-stage dry eye that might be suited to traditional prosthokeratoplasty. All patients in the multicentre clinical trial were managed according to an approved protocol, with Ethics Committee approval in each centre. Preoperative visual acuity ranged from perception of light (PL) to 6/60 (20/200). Implantation was by means of an intralamellar technique, with a conjunctival flap in most cases. Tissues anterior to the optic were removed as a secondary procedure. Up to 30 November 2001, 40 AlphaCor devices had been implanted in 38 patients, of mean age 60 years. Follow-up ranged from 0.5 months to 3 years. There had been one extrusion (2.5%) and four cases (10%) where a device had been removed due to melt-related complications. All five of these cases received a donor corneal graft after the device was removed, with these grafts remaining anatomically satisfactory and epithelialised to date. Corneal melts in AlphaCor recipients were found to be strongly associated with a history of ocular herpes simplex infection. Two further devices (5%) were removed owing to reduced optic clarity after presumed drug-related deposition, and have been successfully replaced with second devices. Mean preoperative best-corrected visual acuity was hand movements. Visual acuities after surgery ranged from PL to 6/6(-2) (20/20(-2)). Early results suggest that the AlphaCor, previously known as the Chirila keratoprosthesis (Chirila KPro), has a low incidence of the complications traditionally associated with keratoprostheses and can be effective in restoring vision in patients considered untreatable by conventional corneal transplantation. Importantly, the device can be replaced with a donor graft in the event of development of a significant complication. A history of ocular herpes simplex is a contraindication to AlphaCor implantation. Ongoing monitoring of clinical outcomes in all patients will allow the indications for AlphaCor, as opposed to donor grafts, to be determined.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 88 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
Czechia 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Portugal 1 1%
Unknown 84 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 16 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 17%
Student > Master 12 14%
Student > Bachelor 10 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 8%
Other 13 15%
Unknown 15 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 25 28%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 15 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 10%
Materials Science 6 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 6%
Other 11 13%
Unknown 17 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 November 2016.
All research outputs
#3,271,948
of 22,786,087 outputs
Outputs from Eye
#367
of 4,110 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,726
of 50,221 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Eye
#2
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,786,087 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,110 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 50,221 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.