↓ Skip to main content

The combination of 2,5-dihydroxybenzoic acid and 2,5-dihydroxyacetophenone matrices for unequivocal assignment of phosphatidylethanolamine species in complex mixtures

Overview of attention for article published in Analytical & Bioanalytical Chemistry, February 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
31 Mendeley
Title
The combination of 2,5-dihydroxybenzoic acid and 2,5-dihydroxyacetophenone matrices for unequivocal assignment of phosphatidylethanolamine species in complex mixtures
Published in
Analytical & Bioanalytical Chemistry, February 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00216-018-0926-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jenny Schröter, Annabelle Fülöp, Carsten Hopf, Jürgen Schiller

Abstract

Unequivocal assignment of phospholipid peaks in complex mixtures is difficult if only the m/z values but no tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS) data are available. This is usually the case for matrix-assisted laser/desorption ionization time-of-flight (MALDI-TOF) MS imaging experiments and the analysis has normally to be performed without prior separation. Another problem might be the often matrix-induced loss of one methyl group in phosphatidylcholine (PC) species, which makes them detectable as negative ions becoming isomers of some phosphatidylethanolamines (PEs). Selected lipid mixtures of known compositions were investigated by negative ion MALDI-TOF MS and various imaging experiments. In addition to common matrices such as 2,5-dihydroxybenzoic acid (DHB) and 9-aminoacridine (9-AA), different binary matrices, including 2,5-dihydroxyacetophenone (2,5-DHAP) as matrix additive to DHB, were tested to probe their performance in both ionization modes. Beside artificial PC and PE mixtures of known compositions, egg yolk and liver extracts as well as cryosections from liver and pancreas tissue were selected as biologically relevant systems. The majority of the binary MALDI matrices used here leads to the loss of a methyl group from PC in the negative ion mode, which makes the clear identification of PE species ambiguous. However, this problem does not apply if a mixture of DHB and 2,5-DHAP is used. Therefore, the application of DHB/2,5-DHAP as matrix is a simple method to unequivocally identify PEs even in complex mixtures and tissue sections as negative ions and without the necessity to separate the individual lipid classes prior to MS detection. Graphical abstract Many common MALDI matrices (such as 9-AA) induce the loss of a methyl group from PC rendering the PC detectable as negative ion. These ions (m/z 744.6 in the upper trace) represent isomers of typical PE species. It will be shown that this problem can be avoided if mixtures between DHB and 2,5-DHAP are applied. At these conditions, POPC is exclusively detectable as a matrix adduct with DHB (at m/z 912.6, lower trace) and does not interfere with PE. This approach can also be used in MALDI MS imaging.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 31 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 23%
Researcher 5 16%
Student > Bachelor 2 6%
Other 2 6%
Student > Postgraduate 2 6%
Other 6 19%
Unknown 7 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 8 26%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 13%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 6%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 9 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 March 2018.
All research outputs
#19,951,180
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Analytical & Bioanalytical Chemistry
#6,061
of 9,619 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#330,079
of 455,332 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Analytical & Bioanalytical Chemistry
#94
of 183 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,619 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 455,332 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 183 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.