↓ Skip to main content

Market structure and competition in the healthcare industry

Overview of attention for article published in HEPAC Health Economics in Prevention and Care, February 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (65th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (52nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
436 Mendeley
Title
Market structure and competition in the healthcare industry
Published in
HEPAC Health Economics in Prevention and Care, February 2018
DOI 10.1007/s10198-018-0959-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Martin Lábaj, Peter Silanič, Christoph Weiss, Biliana Yontcheva

Abstract

The present paper provides first empirical evidence on the relationship between market size and the number of firms in the healthcare industry for a transition economy. We estimate market-size thresholds required to support different numbers of suppliers (firms) for three occupations in the healthcare industry in a large number of distinct geographic markets in Slovakia, taking into account the spatial interaction between local markets. The empirical analysis is carried out for three time periods (1995, 2001 and 2010) which characterise different stages of the transition process. Our results suggest that the relationship between market size and the number of firms differs both across industries and across periods. In particular, we find that pharmacies, as the only completely liberalised market in our dataset, experience the largest change in competitive behaviour during the transition process. Furthermore, we find evidence for correlation in entry decisions across administrative borders, suggesting that future market analysis should aim to capture these regional effects.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 436 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 436 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 13 3%
Unspecified 5 1%
Other 5 1%
Student > Bachelor 4 <1%
Researcher 4 <1%
Other 10 2%
Unknown 395 91%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 9 2%
Business, Management and Accounting 7 2%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 2%
Unspecified 5 1%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 <1%
Other 7 2%
Unknown 397 91%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 November 2022.
All research outputs
#7,963,683
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from HEPAC Health Economics in Prevention and Care
#533
of 1,303 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#154,728
of 455,332 outputs
Outputs of similar age from HEPAC Health Economics in Prevention and Care
#9
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,303 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 455,332 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.