↓ Skip to main content

State anxiety and information processing: A 7.5% carbon dioxide challenge study

Overview of attention for article published in Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, February 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
10 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
21 Mendeley
Title
State anxiety and information processing: A 7.5% carbon dioxide challenge study
Published in
Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, February 2018
DOI 10.3758/s13423-017-1413-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kayleigh E. Easey, Jon C. Catling, Christopher Kent, Coral Crouch, Sam Jackson, Marcus R. Munafò, Angela S. Attwood

Abstract

We used the 7.5% carbon dioxide model of anxiety induction to investigate the effects of state anxiety on simple information processing. In both high- and low-anxious states, participants (n = 36) completed an auditory-visual matching task and a visual binary categorization task. The stimuli were either degraded or clear, so as to investigate whether the effects of anxiety are greater when signal clarity is compromised. Accuracy in the matching task was lower during CO2 inhalation and for degraded stimuli. In the categorization task, response times and indecision (measured using mouse trajectories) were greater during CO2 inhalation and for degraded stimuli. For most measures, we found no evidence of Gas × Clarity interactions. These data indicate that state anxiety negatively impacts simple information processing and do not support claims that anxiety may benefit performance in low-cognitively-demanding tasks. These findings have important implications for understanding the impact of state anxiety in real-world situations.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 21 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 38%
Student > Master 3 14%
Student > Bachelor 3 14%
Lecturer 2 10%
Librarian 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 3 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 9 43%
Computer Science 3 14%
Engineering 2 10%
Sports and Recreations 1 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 5%
Other 2 10%
Unknown 3 14%