↓ Skip to main content

Mental Health of Homeless Youth: Moderation by Peer Victimization and Teacher Support

Overview of attention for article published in Child Psychiatry & Human Development, February 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
88 Mendeley
Title
Mental Health of Homeless Youth: Moderation by Peer Victimization and Teacher Support
Published in
Child Psychiatry & Human Development, February 2018
DOI 10.1007/s10578-018-0790-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jenna M. Armstrong, Caitlyn R. Owens, Mary E. Haskett

Abstract

The link between youth homelessness and mental health functioning was examined using state population-representative 2015 Youth Risk Behavior Survey (YRBS) data. The moderating role of victimization and perceived teacher support also was examined. Consistent with hypotheses, results indicated that homelessness was associated with greater mental health challenges, more victimization, and less teacher support. The association between homelessness and mental health was not moderated by perceived teacher support. However, victimization experiences served as a moderator such that more victimization exacerbated the effect of homelessness on mental health challenges. This study supports the utility of the YRBS for gaining understanding of the experiences and needs of youth experiencing homelessness and adds to the growing literature on predictors of individual differences in mental health functioning of these vulnerable youth.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 88 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 88 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 14 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 14%
Researcher 9 10%
Student > Bachelor 7 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 8%
Other 12 14%
Unknown 27 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 20 23%
Social Sciences 13 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 6%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 2%
Other 9 10%
Unknown 32 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 February 2018.
All research outputs
#3,707,111
of 23,577,654 outputs
Outputs from Child Psychiatry & Human Development
#130
of 945 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#83,436
of 448,969 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Child Psychiatry & Human Development
#5
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,654 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 945 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 448,969 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.