↓ Skip to main content

A Family History Study of Male Sexual Orientation Using Three Independent Samples

Overview of attention for article published in Behavior Genetics, March 1999
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
6 X users
wikipedia
7 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
85 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
69 Mendeley
Title
A Family History Study of Male Sexual Orientation Using Three Independent Samples
Published in
Behavior Genetics, March 1999
DOI 10.1023/a:1021652204405
Pubmed ID
Authors

J. Michael Bailey, Richard C. Pillard, Khytam Dawood, Michael B. Miller, Lindsay A. Farrer, Shruti Trivedi, Robert L. Murphy

Abstract

Available evidence suggests that male homosexuality is both familial and somewhat heritable and that some cases may be caused by an X-linked gene. However, most studies have recruited subjects in a relatively unsystematic manner, typically via advertisements, and hence suffer from the potential methodological flaw of ascertainment bias due to volunteer self-selection. In the present study we assessed the familiality of male homosexuality using two carefully ascertained samples and attempted to replicate findings consistent with X-linkage in three samples. The percentage of siblings of the probands rated as either homosexual or bisexual, with a high degree of certainty, ranged from 7 to 10% for brothers and 3 to 4% for sisters. These estimates are higher than recent comparable population-based estimates of homosexuality, supporting the importance of familial factors for male homosexuality. Estimates of lambda s for male homosexuality ranged from 3.0 to 4.0. None of the samples showed a significantly greater proportion of maternal than paternal homosexual uncles or homosexual male maternal first cousins. Although our results differed significantly with those of some prior studies, they do not exclude the possibility of moderate X-linkage for male sexual orientation.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 69 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 3%
Spain 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Nigeria 1 1%
Unknown 64 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 22%
Student > Bachelor 13 19%
Researcher 7 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 7 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 6%
Other 12 17%
Unknown 11 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 22 32%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 13%
Social Sciences 5 7%
Neuroscience 4 6%
Other 5 7%
Unknown 12 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 May 2024.
All research outputs
#2,349,212
of 25,843,331 outputs
Outputs from Behavior Genetics
#123
of 975 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,350
of 36,202 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Behavior Genetics
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,843,331 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 975 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 36,202 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them