Title |
“Fluidic diode” for passive unidirectional liquid transport bioinspired by the spermathecae of fleas
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Bionic Engineering, January 2018
|
DOI | 10.1007/s42235-017-0003-7 |
Authors |
Gerda Buchberger, Alexander Kogler, Agnes Weth, Richard Baumgartner, Philipp Comanns, Siegfried Bauer, Werner Baumgartner |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 35 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 17% |
Researcher | 5 | 14% |
Student > Bachelor | 5 | 14% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 9% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 9% |
Other | 3 | 9% |
Unknown | 10 | 29% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Engineering | 8 | 23% |
Materials Science | 5 | 14% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 6% |
Chemistry | 2 | 6% |
Computer Science | 2 | 6% |
Other | 4 | 11% |
Unknown | 12 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 February 2018.
All research outputs
#1,341,263
of 23,023,224 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Bionic Engineering
#7
of 172 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,351
of 441,221 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Bionic Engineering
#1
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,023,224 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 172 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 441,221 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them