↓ Skip to main content

Choosing to Suffer: Reflections on an Enigma

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Religion and Health, September 2003
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
10 Mendeley
Title
Choosing to Suffer: Reflections on an Enigma
Published in
Journal of Religion and Health, September 2003
DOI 10.1023/a:1024843702805
Authors

Allan S. Berger

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 10 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 30%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 20%
Professor 1 10%
Student > Bachelor 1 10%
Student > Master 1 10%
Other 1 10%
Unknown 1 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Arts and Humanities 2 20%
Psychology 2 20%
Philosophy 1 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 10%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 10%
Other 2 20%
Unknown 1 10%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 April 2020.
All research outputs
#8,533,995
of 25,368,786 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Religion and Health
#444
of 1,345 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,839
of 53,937 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Religion and Health
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,368,786 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,345 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 53,937 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them