↓ Skip to main content

Respiratory and Acoustic Signals Associated with Bolus Passage during Swallowing

Overview of attention for article published in Dysphagia, April 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (77th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
4 patents
wikipedia
5 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
77 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
35 Mendeley
Title
Respiratory and Acoustic Signals Associated with Bolus Passage during Swallowing
Published in
Dysphagia, April 2014
DOI 10.1007/s004550010006
Pubmed ID
Authors

Adrienne L. Perlman, Sandra L. Ettema, Joseph Barkmeier

Abstract

In order to advance our understanding of the relation between respiration and deglutition, simultaneous videofluoroscopy and respirodeglutometry was performed. Fifteen normal, healthy, young adults (20-29 years of age) were connected to a respirodeglutometer and positioned for simultaneous videofluoroscopic assessment in the lateral plane. Subjects performed three swallows each of a 5-ml and a 10-ml bolus of liquid barium and a 5-ml bolus of paste barium, for a total of nine swallows per subject. Location of the bolus head as identified with videofluoroscopy was associated with eight respirodeglutometric variables. In addition, temporal relations for seven respirodeglutometric variables were calculated as a function of bolus volume and viscosity. Significant temporal differences were found for five of the variables by volume. No significant temporal differences were noted by viscosity. Expiration occurred before 79% and after 96% of the swallows. The number of inspirations preceding a swallow suggested a possible effect resulting from the need to hold a bolus in the mouth before receiving instructions to swallow during videofluoroscopic assessment. This effect may be important during patient evaluation. For a significant number of swallows, respiratory flow ceased before the velum was fully elevated.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 35 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 23%
Student > Master 7 20%
Student > Postgraduate 5 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 9%
Other 2 6%
Other 6 17%
Unknown 4 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 15 43%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 11%
Psychology 4 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 9%
Arts and Humanities 1 3%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 6 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 November 2022.
All research outputs
#5,700,702
of 23,839,820 outputs
Outputs from Dysphagia
#359
of 1,327 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,046
of 228,230 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Dysphagia
#7
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,839,820 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,327 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 228,230 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.