↓ Skip to main content

Current status of food-borne trematode infections

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
54 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
90 Mendeley
Title
Current status of food-borne trematode infections
Published in
European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases, January 2012
DOI 10.1007/s10096-011-1515-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

R. Toledo, J. G. Esteban, B. Fried

Abstract

Food-borne trematodiases constitute an important group of the most neglected tropical diseases, not only in terms of research funding, but also in the public media. The Trematoda class contains a great number of species that infect humans and are recognized as the causative agents of disease. The biological cycle, geographical distribution, and epidemiology of most of these trematode species have been well characterized. Traditionally, these infections were limited, for the most part, in populations living in low-income countries, particularly in Southeast Asia, and were associated with poverty. However, the geographical limits and the population at risk are currently expanding and changing in relation to factors such as growing international markets, improved transportation systems, and demographic changes. The diagnosis of these diseases is based on parasitological techniques and only a limited number of drugs are currently available for treatment, most of which are unspecific. Therefore, in-depth studies are urgently needed in order to clarify the current epidemiology of these helminth infections and to identify new and specific targets for both effective diagnosis and treatment. In this review, we describe the biology, medical and epidemiological features, and current treatment and diagnostic tools of the main groups of flukes and the corresponding diseases.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 90 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
Uruguay 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Unknown 87 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 14 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 14%
Researcher 12 13%
Student > Master 11 12%
Student > Postgraduate 6 7%
Other 13 14%
Unknown 21 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 17 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 9%
Immunology and Microbiology 7 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 7%
Other 23 26%
Unknown 23 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 March 2014.
All research outputs
#7,453,350
of 22,786,087 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases
#778
of 2,769 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#70,354
of 242,426 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases
#10
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,786,087 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,769 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.6. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 242,426 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.