↓ Skip to main content

Compatibility conditions for a left Cauchy-Green strain field

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Elasticity, June 1989
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#13 of 102)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
32 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
23 Mendeley
Title
Compatibility conditions for a left Cauchy-Green strain field
Published in
Journal of Elasticity, June 1989
DOI 10.1007/bf00045780
Authors

Janet A. Blume

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 1 4%
Unknown 22 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 30%
Researcher 4 17%
Professor 2 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 4%
Student > Bachelor 1 4%
Other 4 17%
Unknown 4 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 12 52%
Physics and Astronomy 3 13%
Computer Science 2 9%
Materials Science 1 4%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 4 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 April 2024.
All research outputs
#7,453,350
of 22,786,087 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Elasticity
#13
of 102 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,165
of 14,879 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Elasticity
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,786,087 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 102 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 14,879 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them