| Title |
Tissue-Specific Antioxidative Responses and Cadmium Accumulation in Silurus meridionalis Under Chronic Waterborne Cadmium Exposure
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, February 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00128-018-2294-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jian Li, Yulian Yan, Xiaojun Xie |
| Abstract |
In this study, the oxidative damage, antioxidative responses and cadmium (Cd) accumulation in juvenile Silurus meridionalis were studied, after S. meridionalis were exposed to 0 (control), 62.5, 125, 250 and 500 µg Cd/L for 56 days. Cd accumulation, malondialdehyde, superoxide dismutase (SOD), catalase, glutathione (GSH) and total antioxidant capacity (T-AOC) were determined in gill, liver, kidney and intestine tissues. The results showed that the Cd accumulation in S. meridionalis was dose-dependent and tissue-specific, with the highest Cd content in the kidney, followed by the liver, gill, and intestine. Waterborne Cd stress in S. meridionalis was expressed as tissue-specific oxidative damage and antioxidant responses in gill, liver, kidney and intestine tissues. Waterborne Cd exposure induced the most significant oxidative damage in the gill, followed by the liver and kidney, while the intestine showed no sensitivity to waterborne Cd exposure. The antioxidants, such as SOD in the liver, kidney and intestine, as well as T-AOC and GSH in the gill, liver and kidney, were sensitive to waterborne Cd exposure. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 13 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 2 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 15% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 8% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 8% |
| Other | 3 | 23% |
| Unknown | 3 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 15% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 8% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 8% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 8% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 8% |
| Other | 2 | 15% |
| Unknown | 5 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 March 2018.
All research outputs
#15,827,358
of 24,119,703 outputs
Outputs from Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology
#2,483
of 4,112 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#267,699
of 453,358 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology
#17
of 70 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,119,703 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,112 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 453,358 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 70 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.