↓ Skip to main content

Decay rates of attractive and repellent pheromones in an ant foraging trail network

Overview of attention for article published in Insectes Sociaux, April 2008
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
6 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
33 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
98 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
connotea
1 Connotea
Title
Decay rates of attractive and repellent pheromones in an ant foraging trail network
Published in
Insectes Sociaux, April 2008
DOI 10.1007/s00040-008-0994-5
Authors

E. J. H. Robinson, K. E. Green, E. A. Jenner, M. Holcombe, F. L. W. Ratnieks

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 98 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Denmark 3 3%
United States 2 2%
Brazil 1 1%
Germany 1 1%
France 1 1%
Poland 1 1%
Unknown 89 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 24%
Student > Bachelor 17 17%
Researcher 12 12%
Student > Postgraduate 7 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 5%
Other 22 22%
Unknown 11 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 51 52%
Environmental Science 8 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 5%
Computer Science 4 4%
Physics and Astronomy 3 3%
Other 9 9%
Unknown 18 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 September 2023.
All research outputs
#7,427,950
of 22,707,247 outputs
Outputs from Insectes Sociaux
#322
of 962 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,211
of 80,920 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Insectes Sociaux
#2
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,707,247 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 962 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 80,920 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.