↓ Skip to main content

Clinical pharmacists in general practice: value for patients and the practice of a new role

Overview of attention for article published in British Journal of General Practice, April 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (65th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
37 Mendeley
Title
Clinical pharmacists in general practice: value for patients and the practice of a new role
Published in
British Journal of General Practice, April 2015
DOI 10.3399/bjgp15x685033
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mark Christopher Stone, Helen Catherine Williams

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 37 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 6 16%
Student > Bachelor 5 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 11%
Student > Postgraduate 3 8%
Researcher 3 8%
Other 7 19%
Unknown 9 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 11 30%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 24%
Unspecified 2 5%
Social Sciences 2 5%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 3%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 10 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 February 2018.
All research outputs
#7,488,820
of 23,023,224 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of General Practice
#2,424
of 4,318 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#90,822
of 265,667 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of General Practice
#34
of 55 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,023,224 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,318 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.1. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 265,667 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 55 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.