| Title |
Negative thermal expansion: a review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Materials Science, July 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10853-009-3692-4 |
| Authors |
W. Miller, C. W. Smith, D. S. Mackenzie, K. E. Evans |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 333 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 3 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 322 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 77 | 23% |
| Researcher | 47 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 42 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 25 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 23 | 7% |
| Other | 41 | 12% |
| Unknown | 78 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chemistry | 70 | 21% |
| Materials Science | 68 | 20% |
| Engineering | 52 | 16% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 36 | 11% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 6 | 2% |
| Other | 13 | 4% |
| Unknown | 88 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 January 2024.
All research outputs
#5,163,606
of 24,387,992 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Materials Science
#316
of 4,837 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,660
of 114,635 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Materials Science
#5
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,387,992 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,837 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 114,635 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.