↓ Skip to main content

Biofilms, a new approach to the microbiology of dental plaque

Overview of attention for article published in Odontology, September 2006
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#23 of 233)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
187 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
233 Mendeley
Title
Biofilms, a new approach to the microbiology of dental plaque
Published in
Odontology, September 2006
DOI 10.1007/s10266-006-0063-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jacob M. ten Cate

Abstract

Dental plaque has the properties of a biofilm, similar to other biofilms found in the body and the environment. Modern molecular biological techniques have identified about 1000 different bacterial species in the dental biofilm, twice as many as can be cultured. Oral biofilms are very heterogeneous in structure. Dense mushroom-like structures originate from the enamel surface, interspersed with bacteria-free channels used as diffusion pathways. The channels are probably filled with an extracellular polysaccharide (EPS) matrix produced by the bacteria. Bacteria in biofilms communicate through signaling molecules, and use this "quorum-sensing" system to optimize their virulence factors and survival. Bacteria in a biofilm have a physiology different from that of planktonic cells. They generally live under nutrient limitation and often in a dormant state. Such "sleepy" bacteria respond differently to antibiotics and antimicrobials, because these agents were generally selected in experiments with metabolically active bacteria. This is one of the explanations as to why antibiotics and antimicrobials are not as successful in the clinic as could be expected from laboratory studies. In addition, it has been found that many therapeutic agents bind to the biofilm EPS matrix before they even reach the bacteria, and are thereby inactivated. Taken together, these fundings highlight why the study of bacteria in the oral cavity is now taken on by studying the biofilms rather than individual species.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 233 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Thailand 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Unknown 222 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 48 21%
Student > Master 31 13%
Student > Bachelor 24 10%
Researcher 19 8%
Student > Postgraduate 19 8%
Other 49 21%
Unknown 43 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 67 29%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 49 21%
Immunology and Microbiology 15 6%
Engineering 10 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 3%
Other 33 14%
Unknown 51 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 December 2020.
All research outputs
#5,447,195
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Odontology
#23
of 233 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,813
of 89,592 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Odontology
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 233 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 89,592 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.