You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Risk Factors, Clinical Characteristics, and Outcome of Nocardia Infection in Organ Transplant Recipients: A Matched Case-Control Study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical Infectious Diseases, April 2007
|
| DOI | 10.1086/514340 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Anton Y. Peleg, Shahid Husain, Zubair A. Qureshi, Fernanda P. Silveira, Molade Sarumi, Kathleen A. Shutt, Eun J. Kwak, David L. Paterson |
| Abstract |
Risk factors for Nocardia infection in organ transplant recipients have not been formally assessed in the current era of transplantation. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 50% |
| Mexico | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 2 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 83% |
| Scientists | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 112 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 111 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 19 | 17% |
| Other | 12 | 11% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 11 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 8% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 7 | 6% |
| Other | 17 | 15% |
| Unknown | 37 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 55 | 49% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 3% |
| Engineering | 3 | 3% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 2 | 2% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 7 | 6% |
| Unknown | 40 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 February 2021.
All research outputs
#4,760,313
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Infectious Diseases
#6,532
of 16,853 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,365
of 91,179 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Infectious Diseases
#29
of 89 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,853 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 31.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 91,179 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 89 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.