↓ Skip to main content

Interaction between ATM protein and c-Abl in response to DNA damage

Overview of attention for article published in Nature, May 1997
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (67th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
7 patents
wikipedia
5 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
408 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
100 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Interaction between ATM protein and c-Abl in response to DNA damage
Published in
Nature, May 1997
DOI 10.1038/387520a0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Timothy Shafman, Kum Kum Khanna, Padmini Kedar, Kevin Spring, Sergei Kozlov, Tim Yen, Karen Hobson, Magtouf Gatei, Ning Zhang, Dianne Watters, Mark Egerton, Yosef Shiloh, Surender Kharbanda, Donald Kufe, Martin F. Laving

Abstract

The gene mutated in the autosomal recessive disorder ataxia telangiectasia (AT), designated ATM (for 'AT mutated'), is a member of a family of phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase-like enzymes that are involved in cell-cycle control, meiotic recombination, telomere length monitoring and DNA-damage response. Previous results have demonstrated that AT cells are hypersensitive to ionizing radiation and are defective at the G1/S checkpoint after radiation damage. Because cells lacking the protein tyrosine kinase c-Abl are also defective in radiation-induced G1 arrest, we investigated the possibility that ATM might interact with c-Abl in response to radiation damage. Here we show that ATM binds c-Abl constitutively in control cells but not in AT cells. Our results demonstrate that the SH3 domain of c-Abl interacts with a DPAPNPPHFP motif (residues 1,373-1,382) of ATM. The results also reveal that radiation-induction of c-Abl tyrosine kinase activity is diminished in AT cells. These findings indicate that ATM is involved in the activation of c-Abl by DNA damage and this interaction may in part mediate radiation-induced G1 arrest.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 100 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 3%
Switzerland 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Unknown 95 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 23%
Researcher 19 19%
Professor 10 10%
Student > Master 8 8%
Student > Bachelor 7 7%
Other 18 18%
Unknown 15 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 33 33%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 33 33%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 8%
Chemical Engineering 2 2%
Arts and Humanities 2 2%
Other 3 3%
Unknown 19 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 December 2023.
All research outputs
#3,317,701
of 23,041,514 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#49,341
of 91,411 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,989
of 30,915 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#64
of 282 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,041,514 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 91,411 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 99.6. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 30,915 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 282 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.