↓ Skip to main content

Nahm's equations and the classification of monopoles

Overview of attention for article published in Communications in Mathematical Physics, September 1984
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
167 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
17 Mendeley
Title
Nahm's equations and the classification of monopoles
Published in
Communications in Mathematical Physics, September 1984
DOI 10.1007/bf01214583
Authors

S. K. Donaldson

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 6%
Ireland 1 6%
Brazil 1 6%
Unknown 14 82%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 35%
Student > Bachelor 2 12%
Student > Postgraduate 2 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 6%
Professor 1 6%
Other 3 18%
Unknown 2 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Mathematics 9 53%
Physics and Astronomy 4 24%
Materials Science 1 6%
Unknown 3 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 October 2013.
All research outputs
#7,453,350
of 22,786,087 outputs
Outputs from Communications in Mathematical Physics
#367
of 2,507 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,481
of 9,049 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Communications in Mathematical Physics
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,786,087 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,507 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 9,049 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.