↓ Skip to main content

Biochemistry and pharmacology of moclobemide, a prototype RIMA

Overview of attention for article published in Psychopharmacology, February 1992
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
96 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
15 Mendeley
Title
Biochemistry and pharmacology of moclobemide, a prototype RIMA
Published in
Psychopharmacology, February 1992
DOI 10.1007/bf02246225
Pubmed ID
Authors

W. Haefely, W. P. Burkard, A. M. Cesura, R. Kettler, H. P. Lorez, J. R. Martin, J. G. Richards, R. Scherschlicht, M. Da Prada

Abstract

RIMA is a term for reversible inhibitors of monoamine oxidase (MAO) with preference for MAO-A; moclobemide is a prototype of this new class of antidepressants and is a highly selective inhibitor of MAO-A in vitro. This inhibition is reversible by dialysis in vitro, which accounts for the dose-dependent duration of in vivo enzyme inhibition of 12-24 h. Moclobemide increases the content of serotonin, noradrenaline and dopamine in the brain, and decreases that of their deaminated metabolites. Its biochemical, neurological and behavioural effects indicate that it increases the extracellular concentration of the classic monoamine neurotransmitters/neuromodulators - in particular 5-HT. Potentiation of the cardiovascular effects of tyramine is less pronounced after taking moclobemide than after irreversible MAO-A inhibitors. Understanding of the physiological role of MAO and of the events that link inhibition of the enzyme with modulation of neuronal activities in the CNS remains incomplete. A major physiological role of intraneuronal MAO is to keep cytosolic amine concentration very low, to enable the neuronal monoamine carriers to produce a net inward transport of monoamines, and thereby to act as the first step in the termination of action of extracellular monoamines. MAO is likely to have a similar function in non-monoaminergic cells with respect to the monoamine carriers they contain. In addition to the classic monoamines, "trace" amines may become functionally active after MAO inhibition. An alternative role for MAO is that of a scavenger, preventing natural substrates from accumulating in monoaminergic neurons and interacting with storage, release, uptake and receptor function of monoamines.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 15 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 20%
Student > Master 3 20%
Student > Bachelor 2 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 13%
Other 1 7%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 4 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 20%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 13%
Chemistry 2 13%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 7%
Neuroscience 1 7%
Other 1 7%
Unknown 5 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 December 2011.
All research outputs
#8,515,480
of 25,388,229 outputs
Outputs from Psychopharmacology
#2,264
of 5,470 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,604
of 62,164 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Psychopharmacology
#5
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,388,229 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,470 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.9. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 62,164 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.