↓ Skip to main content

Endocrine disruptors: update on xenoestrogens

Overview of attention for article published in International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health, September 2000
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
105 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
55 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Endocrine disruptors: update on xenoestrogens
Published in
International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health, September 2000
DOI 10.1007/s004200000163
Pubmed ID
Authors

G. H. Degen, H. M. Bolt

Abstract

Endocrine disruptors and their possible impact on human and animal health have become a topic of discussion and an area of active research in toxicology. A focus has been on xenoestrogens, i.e., environmental chemicals with estrogenic activity. In principle, there is agreement that such compounds, in high doses, may cause developmental, reproductive and tumorigenic effects ("hazard"). A matter of controversy is the question of risks associated with xenoestrogens under realistic (low) exposure scenarios; this is due to uncertainty on how to assess the interactions of exogenous compounds with the endocrine system and its complex regulation. Our overview will address topics including: consequences from previous clinical use of the potent estrogen diethylstilbestrol with particular emphasis on dose-response relationships, other observations in humans exposed to estrogenic chemicals in an occupational context, and available information on exposure levels of synthetic and naturally occurring estrogens in the diet. Together with a critical appraisal of methods to detect and quantitate the estrogenic activity of synthetic and naturally occurring chemicals, novel aspects in the risk assessment for endocrine active compounds are discussed.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 55 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Portugal 1 2%
Germany 1 2%
Unknown 52 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 11 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 13%
Researcher 7 13%
Student > Master 6 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 7%
Other 11 20%
Unknown 9 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 16%
Environmental Science 7 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 5%
Other 10 18%
Unknown 11 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 April 2023.
All research outputs
#5,213,966
of 25,728,855 outputs
Outputs from International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health
#400
of 2,135 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,790
of 38,037 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health
#4
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,728,855 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,135 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 38,037 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.