↓ Skip to main content

Three Conceptions of Rational Agency

Overview of attention for article published in Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, September 1999
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
90 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
44 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Three Conceptions of Rational Agency
Published in
Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, September 1999
DOI 10.1023/a:1009946911117
Authors

R. Jay Wallace

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 9%
Australia 1 2%
Brazil 1 2%
Unknown 38 86%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 34%
Professor > Associate Professor 6 14%
Researcher 5 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 9%
Student > Bachelor 3 7%
Other 9 20%
Unknown 2 5%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Philosophy 27 61%
Social Sciences 7 16%
Computer Science 3 7%
Arts and Humanities 1 2%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 2%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 3 7%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 December 2022.
All research outputs
#8,535,472
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Ethical Theory and Moral Practice
#184
of 657 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,515
of 35,132 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ethical Theory and Moral Practice
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 657 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 35,132 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.