↓ Skip to main content

MAOIs to RIMAs in anaesthesia — a literature review

Overview of attention for article published in Psychopharmacology, February 1992
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
3 Mendeley
Title
MAOIs to RIMAs in anaesthesia — a literature review
Published in
Psychopharmacology, February 1992
DOI 10.1007/bf02246234
Pubmed ID
Authors

S. Hill, K. Yau, J. Whitwam

Abstract

Monoamine oxidase inhibitors (MAOIs) are widely accepted as effective antidepressants. Unfortunately their use has been limited by their capacity to potentiate dietary tyramine (the so called "cheese effect") and their interaction with other drugs. The latter poses a particular problem for patients undergoing anaesthesia. Traditional advice has been to stop MAOI therapy 2 weeks prior to anaesthesia. With the advent of reversible, specific inhibitors of MAO-A (RIMAs) there is less potential for dietary and drug interaction. While experience with these newer drugs is limited so far, this review suggests that combination of modern anaesthetic techniques and newer, specific reversible MAOIs should allow safe anaesthesia with maintenance of antidepressant therapy.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 3 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 33%
Researcher 1 33%
Unknown 1 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 2 67%
Unknown 1 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 September 2017.
All research outputs
#8,521,581
of 25,389,520 outputs
Outputs from Psychopharmacology
#2,221
of 5,317 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,452
of 61,445 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Psychopharmacology
#5
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,389,520 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,317 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.0. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 61,445 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.