↓ Skip to main content

Treatment outcomes for hepatoblastoma: an institution’s experience over two decades

Overview of attention for article published in Pediatric Surgery International, November 2006
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
16 Mendeley
Title
Treatment outcomes for hepatoblastoma: an institution’s experience over two decades
Published in
Pediatric Surgery International, November 2006
DOI 10.1007/s00383-006-1834-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

J. P. Ang, J. A. Heath, S. Donath, S. Khurana, A. Auldist

Abstract

Our objective is to review a leading Australian tertiary referral centre's experience in treating hepatoblastoma over two decades. This is a retrospective study of clinical, radiological and pathological data in hepatoblastoma patients treated at our institution between 1984 and 2004. Thirty children (17 male, 13 female) ranging in age from 5 months to 6.5 years (median 19 months) at diagnosis were reviewed. This is the largest case series reported in Australia to date. The median length of follow-up was 6.3 years (range 7 months to 20.9 years). On average, the number of new cases increased by 0.12 each year (P=0.01). A total of 29 patients underwent definitive surgery for primary tumour control. Of these, two (7%) had initial primary surgery, while 27 (93%) had delayed surgery following neo-adjuvant chemotherapy. Chemotherapy regimens included the SIOPEL study protocols. Patients not enrolled in SIOPEL tended to be given more courses of chemotherapy. Ten patients (34%) received an extended right hemi-hepatectomy, six (21%) had right hemi-hepatectomy, seven (24%) had left hemi-hepatectomy, three (10%) had left lateral segmentectomy, and two (7%) had a non-anatomical resection. In addition, two patients required IVC reconstruction at the time of their primary liver resection. Overall survival at 5 years was 89.1% (95% CI 69.8-96.4%). Event-free survival at 5 years was 75.7% (95% CI 53.2-88.5%). There was a clear increase in the risk of recurrence (RR=4.8) and death (RR=4.5) where margins were not microscopically clear. However, neither reached statistical significance in this small cohort. Surgery was still worthwhile even when margins were involved. There was no correlation between mean AFP level at diagnosis, and outcome. Our experience suggests that the achievement of microscopically clear margins at the time of primary tumour resection is an important factor in achieving a positive long-term outcome. In addition, extended courses of neo-adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with pulmonary metastases achieves good long-term outcomes, provided adequate surgical resection of the primary tumour with clear microscopic margins can be achieved.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 6%
Unknown 15 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 25%
Student > Bachelor 2 13%
Student > Master 2 13%
Researcher 2 13%
Professor 1 6%
Other 2 13%
Unknown 3 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 56%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 6%
Chemistry 1 6%
Psychology 1 6%
Unknown 4 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 December 2020.
All research outputs
#7,453,350
of 22,786,087 outputs
Outputs from Pediatric Surgery International
#218
of 1,251 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,381
of 155,200 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pediatric Surgery International
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,786,087 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,251 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 155,200 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them