| Title |
Visual and statistical analysis of 18F-FDG PET in primary progressive aphasia
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, February 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00259-015-2994-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jordi A. Matías-Guiu, María Nieves Cabrera-Martín, María Jesús Pérez-Castejón, Teresa Moreno-Ramos, Cristina Rodríguez-Rey, Rocío García-Ramos, Aida Ortega-Candil, Marta Fernandez-Matarrubia, Celia Oreja-Guevara, Jorge Matías-Guiu, José Luis Carreras |
| Abstract |
Diagnosing progressive primary aphasia (PPA) and its variants is of great clinical importance, and fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) may be a useful diagnostic technique. The purpose of this study was to evaluate interobserver variability in the interpretation of FDG PET images in PPA as well as the diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of the technique. We also aimed to compare visual and statistical analyses of these images. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 61 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Russia | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 60 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 8 | 13% |
| Other | 6 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 6 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 10% |
| Other | 14 | 23% |
| Unknown | 15 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 21 | 34% |
| Neuroscience | 10 | 16% |
| Psychology | 5 | 8% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 3% |
| Engineering | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 5 | 8% |
| Unknown | 16 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 March 2015.
All research outputs
#15,501,594
of 23,806,312 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging
#1,866
of 3,083 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#204,083
of 356,286 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging
#13
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,806,312 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,083 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 356,286 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.