You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Differential Effector Engagement by Oncogenic KRAS
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cell Reports, February 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.celrep.2018.01.051 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Tina L. Yuan, Arnaud Amzallag, Rachel Bagni, Ming Yi, Shervin Afghani, William Burgan, Nicole Fer, Leslie A. Strathern, Katie Powell, Brian Smith, Andrew M. Waters, David Drubin, Ty Thomson, Rosy Liao, Patricia Greninger, Giovanna T. Stein, Ellen Murchie, Eliane Cortez, Regina K. Egan, Lauren Procter, Matthew Bess, Kwong Tai Cheng, Chih-Shia Lee, Liam Changwoo Lee, Christof Fellmann, Robert Stephens, Ji Luo, Scott W. Lowe, Cyril H. Benes, Frank McCormick |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 8 | 40% |
| France | 1 | 5% |
| Germany | 1 | 5% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 5% |
| Chile | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 8 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 11 | 55% |
| Members of the public | 6 | 30% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 10% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 191 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 191 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 49 | 26% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 44 | 23% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 5% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 4% |
| Other | 20 | 10% |
| Unknown | 50 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 76 | 40% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 28 | 15% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 6% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 6 | 3% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 6 | 3% |
| Other | 13 | 7% |
| Unknown | 51 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 March 2024.
All research outputs
#1,701,147
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Cell Reports
#3,902
of 13,189 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,947
of 455,341 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cell Reports
#97
of 303 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,189 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 455,341 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 303 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.