↓ Skip to main content

Efficacy and Safety of Subdural Drains After Burr-Hole Evacuation of Chronic Subdural Hematomas: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Overview of attention for article published in World Neurosurgery, August 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
57 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
95 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Efficacy and Safety of Subdural Drains After Burr-Hole Evacuation of Chronic Subdural Hematomas: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
Published in
World Neurosurgery, August 2014
DOI 10.1016/j.wneu.2014.08.012
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gabriel Alcalá-Cerra, Adam M.H. Young, Luis Rafael Moscote-Salazar, Ángel Paternina-Caicedo

Abstract

To determine whether the use of a subdural drain after burr-hole evacuation of a chronic subdural hematoma is safe and effective in preventing recurrence and subsequent operations, and as such improving functional outcomes.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 95 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 1%
Colombia 1 1%
Unknown 93 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 12 13%
Other 11 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 11%
Researcher 10 11%
Student > Bachelor 10 11%
Other 23 24%
Unknown 19 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 41 43%
Neuroscience 14 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 3%
Psychology 2 2%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 2%
Other 8 8%
Unknown 25 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 February 2015.
All research outputs
#17,285,036
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from World Neurosurgery
#3,350
of 7,046 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#144,996
of 242,446 outputs
Outputs of similar age from World Neurosurgery
#4
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,046 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 242,446 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.