↓ Skip to main content

Integrating predictive frameworks and cognitive models of face perception

Overview of attention for article published in Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, February 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
63 Mendeley
Title
Integrating predictive frameworks and cognitive models of face perception
Published in
Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, February 2018
DOI 10.3758/s13423-018-1433-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sabrina Trapp, Stefan R. Schweinberger, William G. Hayward, Gyula Kovács

Abstract

The idea of a "predictive brain"-that is, the interpretation of internal and external information based on prior expectations-has been elaborated intensely over the past decade. Several domains in cognitive neuroscience have embraced this idea, including studies in perception, motor control, language, and affective, social, and clinical neuroscience. Despite the various studies that have used face stimuli to address questions related to predictive processing, there has been surprisingly little connection between this work and established cognitive models of face recognition. Here we suggest that the predictive framework can serve as an important complement of established cognitive face models. Conversely, the link to cognitive face models has the potential to shed light on issues that remain open in predictive frameworks.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 63 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 63 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 16%
Student > Master 10 16%
Student > Bachelor 7 11%
Professor 4 6%
Researcher 4 6%
Other 14 22%
Unknown 14 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 26 41%
Neuroscience 6 10%
Engineering 3 5%
Linguistics 2 3%
Philosophy 2 3%
Other 6 10%
Unknown 18 29%