↓ Skip to main content

Evidence of amyloid-β cerebral amyloid angiopathy transmission through neurosurgery

Overview of attention for article published in Acta Neuropathologica, February 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#4 of 2,530)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
141 news outlets
blogs
9 blogs
twitter
52 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
82 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
137 Mendeley
Title
Evidence of amyloid-β cerebral amyloid angiopathy transmission through neurosurgery
Published in
Acta Neuropathologica, February 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00401-018-1822-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Zane Jaunmuktane, Annelies Quaegebeur, Ricardo Taipa, Miguel Viana-Baptista, Raquel Barbosa, Carolin Koriath, Raf Sciot, Simon Mead, Sebastian Brandner

Abstract

Amyloid-β (Aβ) is a peptide deposited in the brain parenchyma in Alzheimer's disease and in cerebral blood vessels, causing cerebral amyloid angiopathy (CAA). Aβ pathology is transmissible experimentally in animals and through medical procedures in humans, such as contaminated growth hormone or dura mater transplantation in the context of iatrogenic prion disease. Here, we present four patients who underwent neurosurgical procedures during childhood or teenage years and presented with intracerebral haemorrhage approximately three decades later, caused by severe CAA. None of these patients carried pathogenic mutations associated with early Aβ pathology development. In addition, we identified in the literature four patients with a history of neurosurgical intervention and subsequent development of CAA. These findings raise the possibility that Aβ pathology may be transmissible, as prion disease is, through neurosurgical procedures.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 52 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 137 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 137 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 15%
Researcher 19 14%
Student > Bachelor 19 14%
Other 9 7%
Professor 9 7%
Other 33 24%
Unknown 28 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 31 23%
Medicine and Dentistry 28 20%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 15 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 2%
Other 19 14%
Unknown 34 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1189. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 December 2023.
All research outputs
#11,969
of 25,436,226 outputs
Outputs from Acta Neuropathologica
#4
of 2,530 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#257
of 470,642 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Acta Neuropathologica
#2
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,436,226 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,530 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 470,642 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.