| Title |
Validation of Bohr dead space measured by volumetric capnography
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Intensive Care Medicine, February 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00134-011-2164-x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Gerardo Tusman, Fernando Suarez Sipmann, Joao B. Borges, Göran Hedenstierna, Stephan H. Bohm |
| Abstract |
Bohr's dead space (VD(Bohr)) is commonly calculated using end-tidal CO(2) instead of the true alveolar partial pressure of CO(2) (PACO(2)). The aim of this work was to validate VD(Bohr) using PACO(2) derived from volumetric capnography (VC) against VD(Bohr) with PACO(2) values obtained from the standard alveolar air formula. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 3 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Scientists | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 73 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 2 | 3% |
| Hungary | 1 | 1% |
| Japan | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 69 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 13 | 18% |
| Other | 10 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 7 | 10% |
| Other | 20 | 27% |
| Unknown | 6 | 8% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 51 | 70% |
| Engineering | 4 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 1% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 5 | 7% |
| Unknown | 8 | 11% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 February 2015.
All research outputs
#13,730,037
of 22,786,087 outputs
Outputs from Intensive Care Medicine
#3,745
of 4,973 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#81,483
of 107,975 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Intensive Care Medicine
#25
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,786,087 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,973 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.9. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 107,975 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.