↓ Skip to main content

Episodic Life Stress and the Development of Overgeneral Autobiographical Memory to Positive Cues in Youth

Overview of attention for article published in Research on Child and Adolescent Psychopathology, February 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (74th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
63 Mendeley
Title
Episodic Life Stress and the Development of Overgeneral Autobiographical Memory to Positive Cues in Youth
Published in
Research on Child and Adolescent Psychopathology, February 2018
DOI 10.1007/s10802-018-0409-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Cope Feurer, Mary L. Woody, Aliona Tsypes, Katie L. Burkhouse, Katelynn Champagne, Brandon E. Gibb

Abstract

Overgeneral autobiographical memory (OGM) has been established as a risk factor for depression in both youth and adults, but questions remain as to how OGM develops. Although theorists have proposed that the experience of stressful life events may contribute to the development of OGM, no studies have examined the impact of negative life events on prospective changes in OGM. The goal of the current study was to address this gap in the literature. Participants included 251 mothers and their biological children (aged 8-14 years old at the initial assessment). Using a multi-wave prospective design with assessments every 6 months for 2 years, we found that episodic life stress predicted prospective decreases in youths' autobiographical memory specificity to positive, but not negative, cues. This study supports theories proposing that negative life events may contribute to the development of OGM, but suggest that, in youth, the impact of life stress on OGM may be specific to positive rather than negative memories.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 63 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 63 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 17%
Student > Master 10 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 10%
Student > Bachelor 6 10%
Researcher 6 10%
Other 10 16%
Unknown 14 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 20 32%
Social Sciences 6 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 3%
Unspecified 2 3%
Other 6 10%
Unknown 23 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 May 2019.
All research outputs
#3,711,927
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Research on Child and Adolescent Psychopathology
#361
of 2,047 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#85,874
of 470,360 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Research on Child and Adolescent Psychopathology
#9
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,047 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 470,360 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.