↓ Skip to main content

Bioprosthetic Versus Mechanical Valve Replacement for Infective Endocarditis: Focus on Recurrence Rates

Overview of attention for article published in The Annals of Thoracic Surgery, February 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
23 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
37 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
64 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Bioprosthetic Versus Mechanical Valve Replacement for Infective Endocarditis: Focus on Recurrence Rates
Published in
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery, February 2018
DOI 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2017.12.046
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nana Toyoda, Shinobu Itagaki, Henry Tannous, Natalia N Egorova, Joanna Chikwe

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 23 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 64 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 64 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 7 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 9%
Researcher 6 9%
Student > Bachelor 6 9%
Student > Postgraduate 4 6%
Other 16 25%
Unknown 19 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 32 50%
Engineering 2 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 2%
Other 5 8%
Unknown 21 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 March 2018.
All research outputs
#2,803,894
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from The Annals of Thoracic Surgery
#535
of 8,441 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#63,947
of 459,911 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Annals of Thoracic Surgery
#21
of 175 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,441 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 459,911 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 175 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.