You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Polishing of fiber optic connectors
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal of Machine Tools & Manufacture, May 2004
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2003.10.029 |
| Authors |
Ling Yin, H. Huang, W.K. Chen, Z. Xiong, Y.C. Liu, P.L. Teo |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Switzerland | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 35 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 33% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 11% |
| Researcher | 3 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 6 | 17% |
| Unknown | 3 | 8% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 15 | 42% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 13 | 36% |
| Materials Science | 2 | 6% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 4 | 11% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 December 2020.
All research outputs
#8,535,472
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Machine Tools & Manufacture
#95
of 424 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,973
of 62,297 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Machine Tools & Manufacture
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 424 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 62,297 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.