| Title |
Two decades of pulsar timing of Vela
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Astrophysics and Space Science, March 2007
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10509-007-9372-4 |
| Authors |
Richard Dodson, Dion Lewis, Peter McCulloch |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Belgium | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 7 | 88% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 50% |
| Researcher | 2 | 25% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Physics and Astronomy | 8 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 April 2009.
All research outputs
#8,527,033
of 25,378,162 outputs
Outputs from Astrophysics and Space Science
#466
of 2,353 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,039
of 90,430 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Astrophysics and Space Science
#2
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,378,162 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,353 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 90,430 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.