↓ Skip to main content

Prospective Comparison of the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2 (MMPI-2) and MMPI-2-Restructured Form (MMPI-2-RF) in Predicting Treatment Outcomes Among Patients with Chronic Low Back Pain

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings, February 2018
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
40 Mendeley
Title
Prospective Comparison of the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2 (MMPI-2) and MMPI-2-Restructured Form (MMPI-2-RF) in Predicting Treatment Outcomes Among Patients with Chronic Low Back Pain
Published in
Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings, February 2018
DOI 10.1007/s10880-017-9535-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anthony M. Tarescavage, Judith Scheman, Yossef S. Ben-Porath

Abstract

The purpose of the current study was to examine the relative utility of the most updated MMPI adult instrument, the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2-Restructured Form (MMPI-2-RF), which was designed to address psychometric limitations of the MMPI-2. To this end, we compared mean scores and correlates of emotional distress treatment outcomes using the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales in a sample of 230 patients (73 males, 157 females) who had completed an interdisciplinary chronic pain rehabilitation program. Structural equation modeling analyses indicated that higher scale scores from all the MMPI-2-RF substantive domains were meaningfully associated with worse emotional distress outcomes, whereas the MMPI-2 Clinical Scales generally did not have any meaningful associations. Similar results were found in additional analyses using a clinically significant change framework with more direct clinical implications. The results of this study provide preliminary support for the use of the MMPI-2-RF among patients with chronic low back pain.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 40 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 15%
Other 4 10%
Student > Bachelor 3 8%
Student > Master 3 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 5%
Other 6 15%
Unknown 16 40%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 9 23%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 8%
Unspecified 1 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 3%
Other 4 10%
Unknown 17 43%